Discussion on designs for coated boolets

Home Forums NOE Forums NOE Archive Historical Archive Group Buys Group Buy Discussions Discussion on designs for coated boolets

  • This topic is empty.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #487578
    clintonwhite
      Up
      0
      Down
      ::

      I keep hammering on Al about more designs for PC bullets (No Lube Grooves). He said he was pretty busy, and suggested I bring it up in the discussions forum.
      So here I am…..
      Fellow Powder and Hi Tec coaters, here is your chance to bring up a design and see it come to life.
      As for my self.
      I shoot a lot of pistol. I already own an RG4 9mm/135Gr. no groove (Fantastic mold)
      I might like to see a light weight and a heavy.40 and a couple in .45ACP.
      I haven’t stepped off into the rifle stuff yet but if there is something you would like to see ?

    Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #493201
      chrislatch
      Participant
        Up
        0
        Down
        ::

        I understand that lube grooves are not needed on PC bullets (I use ESPC for 30-30, .45ACP, and .38/357s), but what do they hurt?

        The presence of lube grooves makes bullets of a given weight have less bearing surface (less friction/pressure) spread out over more length (better alignment) and gives you the option to fall back to conventional lubes, or…gosh, I hate to admit this….sometimes when I have a bullet that isn’t coated perfectly, I smear lube on it and shoot it anyway. You can’t do that with a slickside.

        I see how it might be nice in the 9mm or other small high-pressure caliber to minimize the amount of bullet sticking down into your powder space, but speaking in general terms, I think lube grooves help more than they hurt, even in PC applications.

        I could be wrong, and am interested in hearing arguments contrary to my own. And as always ‘I want it that way’ is all the argument you really need.

        #493202
        clintonwhite
          Up
          0
          Down
          ::

          I’m horrible at predicting the future.
          That said I don’t think the coating craze is going to go away any time soon, Neither is the traditional lube and bullet going away any time soon.
          My opinion is that it adds new technology and a new way of thinking to an old hobby. You know how that works out, anytime someone upsets the apple cart you going to make people mad and defensive.
          There is still a lot to learn about the coating craze. I myself have wondered if the lube grooves may be beneficial. When we stop experimenting or striving to improve and we just accept something as just good enough then we have lost sight of why we cast to begin with.
          So far my personal results with PC are very promising, as always there is work to be done and ideas to test. I think Al will only sell more of the slick sided molds in the future… We will see how wrong I am.

          #493203
          chrislatch
          Participant
            Up
            0
            Down
            ::

            I’m horrible at predicting the future.
            That said I don’t think the coating craze is going to go away any time soon, Neither is the traditional lube and bullet going away any time soon.
            My opinion is that it adds new technology and a new way of thinking to an old hobby. You know how that works out, anytime someone upsets the apple cart you going to make people mad and defensive.
            There is still a lot to learn about the coating craze. I myself have wondered if the lube grooves may be beneficial. When we stop experimenting or striving to improve and we just accept something as just good enough then we have lost sight of why we cast to begin with.
            So far my personal results with PC are very promising, as always there is work to be done and ideas to test. I think Al will only sell more of the slick sided molds in the future… We will see how wrong I am.

            I agree that they will sell. I don’t make them, though, so that’s not really a concern of mine. My concern is: are they really superior?

            Like I said, I’m a coater….I just don’t see slick-sided bullets as being superior.

            #493204
            clintonwhite
              Up
              0
              Down
              ::

              Well this is what I would like to see in a no groove design.
              9mm .. I already own the 135 Gr RG4 9mm  Perfect for coating in the 9mm autos

              357/38 2 weights
              125/135
              160

              .40 I would like to see 3 weights and I prefer to use the RG4
              135/140
              165/170
              200

              .45 2 weights
              180
              230

              Personally I would be willing to purchase 1 of each of the listed calibers and weights now
              so that’s a total of 7 molds
              But as stated I would like to get the RG4 design with HP and Flat pins

              Anyone else?

              #493205
              johntucker
              Participant
                Up
                0
                Down
                ::

                Really though you’re talking about heavier bullets with HP’s to keep at optimal weight. I like the idea of no lube grooves but don’t see the real benefit. In my PC experience the grooves coat quicker/easier than bearing surfaces. Also taking the weight out from the grooves means it has to go somewhere, right? Then add a HP?  So you end up with longer bullets?

                And for those who like big bore WFN designs, the HP’s will clog for those who do BBDT method, ask me how I know. And no, the BB will not withstand the curing process and make redneck Corbon powerball clones, ask me how I know.

                I’d probably try one mold as a solid in the 200grn+ range for 45.

              Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.