- This topic is empty.
-
Topic
-
Been using cast in wheel guns and pistols for many years, most from commercial sources and a small percentage of my own when I had the extra time.
A 223 Rem is my first adventure with cast in center fire rifles so could use a bit of advice.
Have the PB mould and Patmarlins PB checkmaker. Feel like tweezers would help. Pop can punchings.
Casting WW and water quenching. LASC Cast Bullet notes quotes 18 BHN. The tests I run are 21 to 22. Same source “The Myth of Arsenic” by Wiljen gets 21 with tap water (66F) and 25 with antifreeze cooled with dry ice (19F) so I am in the correct ball park. They are 64 grain per the drawing.
First blush is 21g AA2460 Lyman says 20.5 WW 748 for Contender. For those that weren’t around back when AA was a data powder and we ordered it direct from McEwen, TN, the data was WW 748.
Test platform is a 700 varminter in 223 Rem – twist 1:12. Shoots better with jackets than I could back when I still had young eyes.
Tried 2 without the Aluminum checks and got the gray cloud about 10 feet from the muzzle and pristine target as predicted for non checked over 1500 to 2000 fps.
With the checks not a bragging group, but a nice place to start.
Too rainy to drag out the Oehler for now.
Lyman manual for 225462 says OAL 2.090 That OAL is between the front 2 grooves. I’m using a LEE factory crimp so no groove is a non issue.
The first try was crimping in the top groove for OAL 1.994 in max length cases. That decreases case volume and will jack pressure.
Functioning is not an issue with the bolt action.
The 700 likes most condoms about 40 mills from touching the lands.
Is there an argument with cast in center fire rifle to prefer using a groove enforced OAL or specified cartridge as choice? With jackets OAL is choice so would guess using the groove in my initial test was a mistake.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Keeping the mould around 400F is also fun.

