Frustrated 30-30s in AZ

Home Forums NOE Forums NOE Archive Historical Archive Using NOE Moulds Casting and Reloading Frustrated 30-30s in AZ

  • This topic is empty.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #488789
    markconner
    Participant
      Up
      0
      Down
      ::

      I have 5 marlin 336 30-30s as follows: 1964 Westernfield, 1967 Glenfield, 1969 Marlin, 1977 Marlin, 1978 Marlin, all 5 slug out at .3075″ – .3085″. All 5 rifles will shoot jacketed bullets at 100 yards with a 2 – 3” group.  I ordered a NOE 311-165-RF 2 cavity GC, my understanding: this mold is designed for the older Marlins.

      I sized at .311″, but the bullets would not chamber in any of the 5 rifles. I then sized them again to .310″. The bullets were engraved by the lands and groves before  the ogive. I would have had to trim the cases over a ¼” to get this bullet to fit properly in my chambers, but then it would not act as a bore rider.  As sold, this mold casts bullets that will never work in my rifles. This is supposed to be the bullet design, according to Ranch dog, for my era of rifles. I sent a letter stating my issues to NOE via the contact info on the web site.  I have yet to receive a reply.

      I then researched and found the SC311 165Gr. RF 2 cavity GC. This bullet’s nose is shorter and instead of the bullet being sized straight from the base to the ogive diameter as the previous mold. This mold right after the front driving band measures .303″ as per specs and tapers to the meplate diameter. My understanding, is that the SC311 165Gr mold is smaller in diameter before the ogive. Being designed for “Remlins” with shorter chambers, I thought it might work in my 5 rifles also with shorter chambers.

      The SC311 165Gr. RF mold throws very good bullets, but only half of the cast bullets will chamber in only one 30-30, that is the 1977 Marlin.  This gun has the largest lead/throat of the 5 rifles.  This mold is supposed to cast .311” diameter and in front of the  1st driving band as per NOE specs is supposed to be .303”.  When casting with COWW, the SC311 165 mold will cast bullets of .3115” to .312” diameter (this is good) and the diameter in front of the 1st driving band is .305” to .308”. (This is supposed to be .303” as per specs.) These bullet noses hit the lands, when seated to the crimping band.  My findings are the bullets that will chamber in the one rifle are the bullets with the smaller diameter nose. 
      I then trimmed my brass from 2.039″ to  1.98” (.059” shorter).  The gas check was below the neck crimped at the cannelure.  I loaded quite a few and the accuracy is minute of a huge barn door!  I figure this was because bullet was no longer a bore rider and was jumping into the lands affecting the accuracy and the bullet base/gas check below the neck.  I would have lived with shorter brass if the accuracy was there.  Rats!

      I have cast numerous times, varying the temperature, from 600-625° F to 725-750° F, hoping to get the nose to cast a smaller diameter on my water quenched bullets. I checked the Brinell Hardness with a Lee BHN tester.  My alloy, water quenched is 20-22 BHN.  The same alloy air quenched is approximately 12 BHN.

      In all 5 rifles the bore/lands where the bullets seats is .300″ – .3005″. I ordered a nose sizing die to size the nose on the SC311 165Gr mold as I felt that this would fix my nose size problem. While trying to nose size the SC311 165Gr. RF 2 cavity GC the NOE top punch that is to be used to push the bullet back out of the nose sizing die does not fit in the bore of the  .300″ sizing die as per NOE instructions.  Creating the inability to push the bullets out  of the sizing die. I cut a ¼” rod to use with the nose size top punch holder, allowing me to tap the bullets out of the sizer. I was able to size the nose to .300″, which just lightly engages the lands in the chamber. Okay, good.

      I went to remove the nose sizing die from the holder die body and the small set screw has chipped the die body. The nose sizing die from the small set screw has also, peened the edge of the nose sizer lip. I had to tap the die out of the holder with a punch and then had to to file the peen off as it would not reinsert into the die holder. There was damage from the peening  of the set screw.  I guess the pressure of sizing the SC311 165Gr nose from .305”-.308” down to .300 is creating a lot of force when tapping the bullets out of the sizing die.  Thus, peening the set screw and retaining lip on the sizer itself.  I did lubricate the bullets prior to sizing, but the lube was cut off during sizing. 
      I have yet to shoot these nosed sized bullets as Arizona went to fire restrictions this week, with no shooting in the forest/public lands until further notice.  I hope the nose sizing will shoot accurate.  I am unsure of the longevity of the NOE nose sizing die because of the small set screw peening.

      This is a good concept but when a person taps the bullet out of the die body there is too much force and it screws up the small set screw and the shoulder on the nose die. This set up needs either more set screws, larger screws or a reinforced way to hold the nose sizing die. In the case of the NOE SC311 165Gr, I had to shave .005” to .008″ (.305” – .308” to .300” diameter of the nose sizing die) to get these bullets to chamber. The NOE SC311 165Gr. RF 2 cavity GC bullet removal from the sizing dies is what messed up the set screw holder in the nose sizing die.

      I do shoot the 170 Grain Lee bullets that I cast and about 70% of these Lee bullets will chamber after sizing and lubing. Once I nose sized the Lee bullets 100% would chamber
      The Lee bullets cast .300” – .301” at the nose.  I only need to nose size .001” or less.  I don’t need much force to tap out the bullet from the sizing die as the NOE SC311 165 Gr. The Lee bullets don’t put as much stress on the set screw of the NOE holder with the bullet removal from the sizing die.

      It is too bad that I have over $250.00 plus dollars in 2 molds and nose sizing dies. The only cast bullet that chambers and shoots and is marginally accurate at 75 yards (4 -5 inch group) is the $19.99 Lee mold.. ARRggggg… The Lee nose diameter is good, but the bullets cast out at .309 – .3095″.  Thus the accuracy problems in Micro Grove barrels.  I have honed the die but to get by, but I want a good quality mold to work. 

      Casting bullets is supposed to be relaxing and the opportunity to save money….hahahaha. …

      Any other people problems with the ranchdog molds and Marlin 30-30s.
      Thanks for reading my rant.   

    Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #504312
      markconner
      Participant
        Up
        0
        Down
        ::

        Just an update.  I was very surprised to receive a telephone call from NOE.  Al called me and we talked on my chamber problems with my 30-30s.  Al offered to have me send back both molds.  So, the mold 311-165 and the sc311-165 mold are going to be check out.    I am still shocked to receive this call.  My little bullet casting issue does not matter one bit in this world with the turmoil we live in.  Yet NOE called to help me find satisfaction with their products.

        Talk about a company going above and beyond customer service.  I will be a customer for life and will spread the word with my peers. 
        Thank you Al.

        Sincerely,
        Mark

        #504313
        lesstaley
          Up
          0
          Down
          ::

          McConnell,  what was the outcome of your nose sizeing problems with the Marlin leverguns?  I have been searching this forums for answers to the exact same questions.  I have a .300 nose sizing die and the bullet centers up as a slip fit in the muzzle of a TC contender 30-06 barrel.  Perfectly!  Haven’t shot any of these bullets yet. (Lee 170 sized .311).

          What’s five years…seems like yesterday🙄

          #504314
          Mike B.
          Moderator
            Up
            0
            Down
            ::

            Just a quick note.
            If you want to answer your own question, there is a simple way to do it.

            Step 1 Go to the SAAMI website. https://saami.org/technical-information/cartridge-chamber-drawings/
            Down load the Cartridge & Chamber dimensions page for the cartridge in question by printing that particular cartridge page.

            Step 2 Go to the NOE forum page. https://noebulletmolds.com/site/using-our-products/faqs/
            Down load the particular cast bullet sketch.

            Look at the dimensions on the SAAMI chamber drawing and take down the freebore distances listed in the taper and the bore dimension.

            Compare the cartridge sketch dimension from where you plan to crimp & seat said cast bullet to, & see if it and the sketch of the associated cast bullet diameter is larger than what the chamber dimensions say it should be…

            The odds are that you will find that is basically where the cast bullet is hanging up when you try to chamber the cartridges in question.

            NOTE: Casting the bullets so that the alloy hardness is a good bit harder than wheelweight alloy will produce a cast bullet that is larger in diameter than what the standard reference for wheelweight is,

            This will basically cause you to cast a bullet that is slightly larger in diameter and also slightly lighter in cast bullet weight.

            This is because there is more tin in the alloy that you are casting with than what the standard wheelweight alloy is supposed to contain.

            With more tin the cast bullet will shrink less when it cools and thus slightly larger in diameter, (& also produce a slightly lighter bullet… in cast bullet weight.)

            I trust that this intel will help guide you to the answer to your questions on why the cast bullets in question will not chamber in the rifles…

            OBTW most of the Marlin rifles that I have looked at over the years tend to have the bare minimum of freebore.
            I believe that this was also noted in the original discussion of the individual in question who had the original problem that NOE responded to. The only Marlin rifle that appeared to be close was the I believe the one with the most wear and thus the most freebore…

          Viewing 3 replies - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.