375296

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #503006
    frankelliott
    Participant
      Up
      0
      Down
      ::

      This is what the 375296 that I had looked like. There seems to be a lot of difference.

      Frank

      #503007
      davidswann
      Participant
        Up
        0
        Down
        ::

        I have seen the bullet profile that you attached and would say it is more recent historically accurate but I have never seen one drop a bullet at .382.  The 1942 Ideal catalog shows a squared grease groove.  I like the version I included in the post because it’s meplat  is wider, less bullet in the case taking up powder space, most bearing surfaces are slightly wider, squared grease grooves and most importantly it’s .380.  I’d really like the profile of the bullet if the meplat were around .265″ which would make it better for hunting purposes.

        #503008
        davidswann
        Participant
          Up
          0
          Down
          ::

          Not much interest in a .380 bullet I guess.  Any recommendations for a .380 – .381 GC bullet mold that is suitable in .375 Winchester & 38-55?  Something between the RCBS .37-250-FN and Ideal 375296.

          #503009
          ringo10x
            Up
            0
            Down
            ::

            I have interest in a 300gr approx mold for .375 H&H.
            I size at .379 now.

          Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.