rerun of 432-265 or 432-300

Up

0

Down

::

Would there be any interest in a re-run of the 432-265 or 432-300?  Would love to grab up one or both of these moulds!

Topic

[markpissosParticipant]

Up

0

Down

::

I would be up for a double crimp groove 300 gr. I’m also in the discussion for the SSK, but I would prefer the Ranch Dog design.  That WFN just looks devastating!

[kenyerian]

Up

0

Down

::

I would be in for a 432-300

[hankmcdavid]

Up

0

Down

::

Is the 265 the Ranchdog design for 44 marlins? If so I’d be down for one

[Ranch Dog]

Up

0

Down

::

Is the 265 the Ranchdog design for 44 marlins? If so I’d be down for one

I designed these two bullets, along with my TLC432-250-RF, to fit both the 444 Marlin and 44 Mag and use them as such.

[brucebrolliniParticipant]

Up

0

Down

::

432-265 4cav PB

[williamquilesParticipant]

Up

0

Down

::

I have the 2x cavity, 432-265 GC and it works great, but I wish the 4x cavity were available again 

[hankmcdavid]

Up

0

Down

::

The 4 cavity plain base looks good to me is it possible to tumble lube this design with good results? Ive been casting bullets since I was a couple teen 30 years ago (NSSA Shoots) But just recently started reloading cartridge guns with cast billets. Currently reloadinng for my 357 Marlin/ruger security six. But I plan to add the 44 magnum and hopefully some type of 45acp.

[Ranch Dog]

Up

0

Down

::

The 4 cavity plain base looks good to me is it possible to tumble lube this design with good results?

I tumble lube everything. I’m shooting these two bullets in my 444 Marlin at over 42.0k PSI. The 265, I call it a 275, cooks along at 2400 FPS when I need the energy deliver to large big game.

[hankmcdavid]

Up

0

Down

::

  Well in that vase definitely sign me up for a 265 not sure how big , probably a 4 cavity, is it possible to get plain base on 3 and 1 gas check base or do I even need to bother with a gas check on these?

[robreynolds]

Up

0

Down

::

Does this thread relate specifically to a tumble lube version of this bullet?

If not there are a couple more interested in this (see the what we would like to see run list).

There’s a thread on the 432-265 bullet there.

[SwedeNelsonKeymaster]

Up

0

Down

::

Have a inventory buy going
http://noebulletmolds.com/smf/index.php/topic,805.0.html
Get your name on the list if you want one.

Bullet maker, maker
Al Nelson

[brucebrolliniParticipant]

Up

0

Down

::

Ok whats the deal.  There is a NOE 432-265-SWC (H&G503) , also being made.

Are both going to be made?

I would prefer, as noted on this buy, 2gc, 2pb. 

The other one seems to be only PB.

Info please.

[craigthompsonParticipant]

Up

0

Down

::

So hows about the 432-300 ?

I wouldn’t mind a 432-300GC RG2 !

RD made a 432-240GC mold at the end of his manufacturing I wouldn’t mind one of those in an RG2 also .

[jefftrimble]

Up

0

Down

::

How well do these do in revolvers?

[Ranch Dog]

Up

0

Down

::

How well do these do in revolvers?

I shoot both the 265 & 300 in my Taurus M44C which is a conceal carry 44 Mag snubby. With that purpose in mind, I only shoot inside 15 yards but it is a ragged hole shooter. I did have customers who used the bullets in revolvers for big game hunting and was sent pictures of their success so I assumed the bullets were appropriate and produced the level of accuracy needed for the task.

I did have a customer ask me to set up the above picture as he wanted to see at what point the bullet ogive engaged the forcing cone. I guess he was pleased as he bought the mold. This is the 300-grain bullet, the nose on the 265 is .030″ shorter and the body has one less lube groove. The top band is .020″ shorter so that is the real difference in fit between the two, the 265 would be .020″ further forward when it engages the cone.

[Author]

Replies