Poor man’s Blackout – 100gn NLG PB .225 for AR15

Home Forums NOE Forums NOE Archive Historical Archive Group Buys Group Buy Discussions Poor man’s Blackout – 100gn NLG PB .225 for AR15

  • This topic is empty.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #489052
    jonasbjork
      Up
      0
      Down
      ::

      Based on the initial discussion in the thread below, I am looking for interested parties to fill the list for a NOE buy if possible.

      http://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?323456-Poor-man-s-Blackout-100gn-subsonic-223-Rem&p=3893396

      100gn.
      Plainbase.
      No lube groove for powder coating.
      RN/spitzer type for feeding in semiautomatic.
      Specs outlined, but not finished (true cast bullet drawing and .223/Wylde chamber consideration appreciated).

      This is a jacketed 100gn that I extrapolated some rough measurements from:

    Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 147 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #505890
      devinfry
        Up
        0
        Down
        ::

        Which part should I shorten, the base band or the mid section?

        This one is with wheel weights.  A harder alloy will weigh less.  How do you want me to modify this one?

        I’d jsut reduce the diameter to .223 in front of the top band and call it good. Close enough to 100gr for me.

        #505891
        Full.Lead.Taco
        Keymaster
          Up
          0
          Down
          ::

          Is the lube groove deep enough?

          #505892
          devinfry
            Up
            0
            Down
            ::

            Its the same depth as the 310-196-FN (MX2-30H), just narrower by .022″. If you feel it is not deep enough you could could change it. Like from .185″ to .180″ maybe?

            #505893
            Full.Lead.Taco
            Keymaster
              Up
              0
              Down
              ::

              I don’t use traditional lube usually, so I have no opinion on the lube groove depth.  Here is the modified drawing of the lube groove version as well as the non lube groove:

              #505894
              jonasbjork
                Up
                0
                Down
                ::

                I’m very satisfied and have no changes. Great work, guys!

                Should we finalize it and try to get ten takers to go Active?

                #505895
                AlvinYork
                Participant
                  Up
                  0
                  Down
                  ::

                  Looks like we have 5 and 1 maybe.
                  Anyone else? Looks like a great bullet and would complement any 300 BLK owners collection!

                  dkf
                  Whistler
                  cornmastah
                  AlvinYork
                  djryan13

                  rsterne?

                  #505896
                  richardmorony
                    Up
                    0
                    Down
                    ::

                    The depth of the lube groove looks sufficient to me, I’m sure Al can help us out in that point, but how about we put the lube groove on the bullet so that it ends up in the neck when seated?

                    Number 1 consideration with this design will absolutely be the question of wether the nose is small enough to chamber when coated.  I have no experience with this, but I DO know that if it’s too big, it WILL be unusable without having to go the extra operation of nose sizing.

                    #505897
                    rsterne
                    Participant
                      Up
                      0
                      Down
                      ::

                      Nope, I’m an airgun guy, sorry….

                      Bob

                      #505898
                      AlvinYork
                      Participant
                        Up
                        0
                        Down
                        ::

                        I took the SAAMI spec for the 223 Remington and crunched the numbers.
                        I took the max measurements to work with this bullet without violating the spec.
                        This looks to be the breakdown :

                        0.5000    Protruding from the case
                        0.2027    Held in the neck
                        0.2873    Wagging in the case

                        So to get the lube groove in the neck we need to push it 0.0813 at minimum.

                        By my reckoning, anyway.

                        #505899
                        AlvinYork
                        Participant
                          Up
                          0
                          Down
                          ::

                          And the second question Hamish posed, is this thing going to fit into the chamber.

                          I just sort of typed while I was looking at the spec.
                          Bottom line, by my calculations
                              1 – the taper from 0.223 to 0.226 cannot exceed 0.224 from the tip of the bullet towards the base for 0.185 inches. Maybe cornmastah can work his magic with the TMT software to see if that holds true.
                              2 – brass thickness at the case neck cannot exceed 0.0135.

                          I’d appreciate a confirmation check by someone if they have the time.

                          Below are my calculations.

                          ==============================================================

                          Well, looking at the SAAMI spec, it seems the chamber goes from 0.254 to 0.224 in about 0.027 from the neck of the cartridge.

                          We’ve got 0.500 protruding, take off 0.027 for the above gap, that leaves 0.473 to account for.

                          According to our bullet diagram, we’re at 0.223 diameter 0.288 from the tip. That’s going to fit into the 0.224 diameter section. We’re down to 0.185 to account for.

                          Assuming there is a taper in the bullet from the 0.223 diameter section up to 0.226, it could not exceed 0.224 (probably want less than that, 0.2235 or something) for 0.185 inches. After that it should all be tucked away in the case.

                          BUT, in the case, the SAAMI spec is assuming a 0.2245, max, bullet width and the neck should not exceed 0.253.
                          Working with just the spec, we have that the spec allows up to 0.253 – 0.2245 = 0.0285 brass thickness. Since there is brass on both sides, the thickness for the wall cannot exceed 0.01425. That’s spec.

                          For our bullet we can plug in the numbers and get 0.253 – 0.226 = 0.027, halved is 0.0135 brass thickness at the neck.

                          SOooo, that means that if your brass is 0.013 or less at the neck, then you could use it with this bullet. If not then you have to find some or you’ll be turning necks down to an acceptable thickness.

                          If we’re going for a 0.226 bullet

                          #505900
                          jonasbjork
                            Up
                            0
                            Down
                            ::

                            SOooo, that means that if your brass is 0.013 or less at the neck, then you could use it with this bullet. If not then you have to find some or you’ll be turning necks down to an acceptable thickness.
                            If we’re going for a 0.226 bullet

                            Great calculations!

                            I pulled this from the 300BLK Talk forum:

                            Good:
                            ADI – 0.012″
                            Aguila – 0.012″
                            A USA – 0.012″
                            FC – 0.013/0.014″ [Note 1]
                            GFL – 0.012″
                            HB – 0.013″
                            Hornady (223 headstamp) – 0.011″
                            Hornady (nickel 223) – 0.012″
                            IK03 – 0.012″ [Note 4]
                            IMI – 0.012″ [Note 4]
                            IVI – 0.013″
                            IVI (’85) – 0.012″ (runs great)
                            LC – 0.011″
                            LC (converted blank) – 0.012″
                            M193 – 0.012″
                            PERFECTA 223 rem. – 0.012″
                            PMC – modern “bronze” and “X-tac” are good, older PMC with small letters may have problems
                            PS – 0.011/0.012″
                            PSD – 0.011″
                            RA – 0.013″
                            RA (’69) – 0.012″
                            RP .223 – 0.011″
                            SSA – 0.012″
                            TAA – 0.013-0.014″ [Note 4]
                            Tula – 0.0115″
                            TZZ – 0.012″
                            WCC – 0.010/0.011″
                            Winchester – 0.011″
                            WIN NT – 0.011″

                            Thick neck wall, bad without neck turning:

                            ATI – 0.015″ [Note 3]
                            CBC – 0.014/0.015″
                            CJ6 – 0.015″
                            DNL – 0.016″
                            FNM – 0.016″ [Note 3]
                            FRONTIER – 0.015″
                            GECO – 0.015/0.016″
                            Hot Shot – 0.014″ [Note 3]
                            HRTRS ( Herters?) – 0.017″
                            ICC – Reported as bad
                            IK03 – 0.015″ [Note 4]
                            IMI – 0.015″ [Note 4]
                            KFA .223 REM – 0.015″-0.019″
                            MKE13 – Anecdotally reported as troublesome
                            MPA – 0.015″
                            NPA – [Note 3]
                            PMC (old headstamp) – 0.015″
                            PMP – 0.015″
                            PPU – 0.014/0.015″ [Note 3]
                            RORG – 0.015″
                            RWS – 0.014-0.015″
                            S&B – 0.015/0.017″
                            TAA – 0.013-0.014″ [Note 4]
                            SADU 5.56 – 0.014-0.015″
                            Wolf Brass .223 – 0.014″

                            #505901
                            AlvinYork
                            Participant
                              Up
                              0
                              Down
                              ::

                              There ya go!

                              That’s the real kind of synergy that takes place on a forum like this!

                              Now if cornmastah, or someone, could see if our diameter doesn’t peak too soon for the chamber then we’re in business!

                              #505902
                              richardmorony
                                Up
                                0
                                Down
                                ::

                                From the discussion on CB

                                #505903
                                jonasbjork
                                  Up
                                  0
                                  Down
                                  ::

                                  Please note that I did that cutaway as a concept sketch with rough estimates of seating depth and bullet length. I do not think it is comparable to the latest drawing we have.

                                  #505904
                                  Full.Lead.Taco
                                  Keymaster
                                    Up
                                    0
                                    Down
                                    ::

                                    Lets see if Al can take a look at this bullet and see what he thinks.

                                  Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 147 total)
                                  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.